The Insider Threat

Check out our thread over at TAA.

http://www.transasianaxis.com/showthread.php?11609-The-Insider-Threat-Program

Now… understand I’m talking about something that is targeting a whole lot of old, white guys, who own guns in the government.

Let me explain my post above.

A while back in the facility where I work they went through some drills. You know, typical duck-and-cover bullshit. Active shooter stuff. Run and hide. Lock the doors. Fight if you gotta… blah blah. The general population wasn’t really involved, or they were just told they didn’t have to participate (and no one did).

Just a few security folks from what I gather, on the outside of the building played the game.  Scenario was simple….

The postulated, imitation shooter was a “disgruntled former worker who was a White male, age 50-something, armed with an assault rifle and moving from building to building shooting personnel.” (words to that effect anyway).

ok, fine. No biggy.  Play your silly-assed games…. BUT….

In this building where I work we have a dozen or more Muslims.

Mostly black males. Some were in the military.  Some likely have seen jail time (Yes, they hire people with criminal backgrounds in the government).  MOST of them are fine individuals, who have the mission at heart.

At least… one would think.

Except:

Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true.

Kitman – Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”) while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of “corruption” and “mischief.”

So – why do we have such people in the system, with clearances, with the ability to walk into a secured compound with a weapon if they chose to do so. Or walk in with a backpack loaded with explosives? We all carry backpacks into the facility. Checks are made (I’ll point out there are certainly holes in any system, and I won’t give details of how things are checked, when or by whom) but suffice it to say I get checked rarely.

Why am I saying all this?

We have Muslims “in the system”.

Men who are going to fight and die for a bunch of BAD GUYS overseas, who believe strongly in their “religion”.  These are men who could be lying to us, face to face.  These are men who are to be considered INSIDER THREATS.  Do we, as a group, as a people, as a company, nation, corporation or a government look at them, profile them and consider them threats? NO, we go after PATRIOTIC AMERICANS, Veterans, gun owners, Conservatives, Christians, Jews and anyone else who is in the MAJORITY of the population as if they were the criminals.

We look at Old, White Men, with Guns as a threat, not as a military or protectors.

And Yet….

ISIS is “here”, as we pointed out yesterday.  They are here, in front of the White House, in front of buildings in YOUR city, taking pictures, threatening us, warning us of what is to come.

ISIS is nothing more than a whole lot of radical Muslims who are falling into line with a “strong group”. Muslims follow the strong horse, not the weak. ISIS appears strong. America appears weak.

While I’m certain the easy targets are malls and schools – there are places, military installations, churches, companies and corporations FULL of these people who hide their radical tendencies just awaiting the day they can do something.

They lie by omission or they flat out lie about their loyalty.

Those at risk will be you and I.

9-11 approaches

 

 

With: Catherine Herridge, Fox News Chief Intel Correspondent; Lt. Col. Oliver North

 This is a rush transcript from “On the Record,” August 26, 2014. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX NEWS HOST: This is a FOX News alert. FOX News confirming an American was killed in Syria while fighting for ISIS. Yes, for ISIS. That’s the same group that executed James Foley.

For the very latest, FOX News chief intelligence correspondent, Catherine Herridge, joins us — Catherine?

CATHERINE HERRIDGE, FOX NEWS CHIEF INTELLIGENCE CORRESPONDENT: Thank you, Greta. Within the last hour, senior law enforcement official confirmed to FOX News that the American citizen killed in Syria was known to the U.S. government and his affiliation also with ISIS. FOX News has been told that the family of Douglas McAuthur McCain, of San Diego, California, has also been notified.

Evidence of his death, including a photo of his American passport, was first reported by the Free Syrian Army, which is fighting against ISIS for control of eastern Syria.

On Twitter in June, he told his ISIS contact that he would soon be meeting them in that country. And as his radicalization deepened, he changed his name it and adopted this moniker, Slave of Allah.

The FBI is tracking dozens of cases of Americans traveling from the U.S. to Syria. And the TSA has instituted new security measures, which help it rack individuals of interest for returning from the region to the United States within 72 hours of their flight. But that system does not flag everyone — Greta?

VAN SUSTEREN: If you fly, of course, first to London and sit there two weeks, you are not in the system at you will, right?

HERRIDGE: You can still be in the system depending on what level of interest you are to the U.S. government.

VAN SUSTEREN: Was this man of sufficient interest that he would have gotten caught?

HERRIDGE: He was of significant interest to the U.S. government and they had been tracking him, it’s now clear to me, for several months.

The interesting continuing thing to me tonight is when the National Security Council put out a statement about his death, they said it was evidence that Americans should not travel to Syria. What they neglected to mention is that he was fighting for ISIS. And this is not a mistake. This is an act of commission.

VAN SUSTEREN: It’s a little absurd to put out a travel advisory to Americans not to travel to Syria.

(CROSSTALK)

VAN SUSTEREN: Not to travel to Syria. That’s almost absurd to tell Americans not to travel to Syria.

HERRIDGE: Well, to mention his death and not the fact that he was affiliated with the group that —

(CROSSTALK)

VAN SUSTEREN: Why didn’t they? Why wouldn’t they?

HERRIDGE: I don’t know. But I think that you do see a pattern often where the affiliation with known terrorist groups is dropped. And it takes me back to the original reporting we did on Major Nidal Hasan and the Fort Hood massacre where that was classified as work-place violence and a great effort to distance him from his al Qaeda affiliation with a cleric in Yemen.

Catherine, thank you.

HERRIDGE: You’re welcome.

VAN SUSTEREN: And Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North joins us. Good evening, sir.

LT. COL. OLIVER NORTH, FOX NEWS HOST, ‘WAR STORIES’: Greta, good to be with you?

VAN SUSTEREN: Catherine just reporting this very disheartening news. Douglas McCain, an American, fighting for ISIS, but NSC gives us a travel warning and doesn’t want to say that he is working with ISIS or was working with ISIS.

NORTH: Douglas McAuthur McCain was his adopted name. When you are looking at now two in a week, the Brit who murdered James Foley, and now an American, you’ve got to recognize, I think, that the State Department and our Department of Homeland Security and our immigration folks and the FBI would be concerned. There appear to be a lot of Westerners. And as Catherine just reported, we really don’t know how many there are. And the estimates vary widely from 300-plus to 3,000-plus.

VAN SUSTEREN: This whole travel alert business, remember the guy who had — the underwear bomber. He must have been — there are so many ways to get passed these no fly lists.

NORTH: There is a lot more of them now than when Richard Reid was doing-and the underwear bomber as well.

(CROSSTALK)

VAN SUSTEREN: — into Detroit.

NORTH: That’s right. The system has improved. But, as everybody acknowledges, it is not foolproof. There are ways to evade it. And one would think that given their sophistication — the folks running ISIS recruiting know how to do it. In other words, if you fly to Turkey, or if you fly to Greece and then motor to Turkey, and then go from Turkey into Syria to become part of ISIS or ISIL or whatever they are calling themselves this week, you may not be in the system when you come back out. We have to be very concerned about what’s happening with these radicalized jihadists coming back to the United States, just like the Europeans.

VAN SUSTEREN: Flying to Montreal and walking across the border of Vermont or whatever.

Anyway, let me go to this other question. You spoke at the American Legion and so did President Obama at the national convention down in North Carolina. How was he received by the American Legion?

NORTH: I think it the proper word would be politely. They are veterans, 2.4 million represented by the 96th meeting of the American Legion. They were polite to him. He did say some things they wanted to hear about improving veterans’ care. The rest of it was almost like it was prepared by several different people. And he just read from the teleprompter. My line was that I learned to speak because I work for a president who spoke from the heart. He speaks from a teleprompter. It was very — it was disjointed. It was irrational in some parts. Quite frankly, we ought to be concerned about that aspect of it because it’s not just detachment. It’s almost delusional. And when he speaks the way he does about our coalition, what coalition?

(CROSSTALK)

VAN SUSTEREN: He said, “In times of crisis, no other nation can rally such broad coalitions to stand up for international norms and peace.” I remember a year ago when he wanted to bomb Syria, the U.K. said — our best friends wouldn’t go with us.

NORTH: And today, for example, it was announced by the Pentagon that we are conducting intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance flights over Syria. Yesterday, we were being told by the same Pentagon that the reason why we are dropping bombs in Iraq and not in Syria is because we were in Iraq at the invitation of the Iraqi government. And to this point, one of the reasons why Mr. Obama withdrew everybody in December of 2011 was because we did not have a Status of Forces agreement. Do we have one now? And no one asks him these things at these briefings.

VAN SUSTEREN: I’m going to ask a question about the vets. He said as soon as it was disclosed, the vet problem. “I got before the American people and I said we would not tolerate it.” That’s what he ran on in 2008. Did the vets politely accept that one?

NORTH: Yeah. They were polite. He is the commander and chief. They were polite. Quite frankly, I was concerned at the end of the whole presentation because it appears to be so detached from the reality of what’s going on in the world today.

VAN SUSTEREN: Colonel North, nice to see you, sir.

ISIS in America

They are here.  Don’t believe me?  Read the next two articles and question WHY FOX NEWS would post, temporarily, information that leads us to believe September 11th might be another day of Terror in America.  First one is Rick Perry stating they are here.  Second article…. scary stuff.  Second article was captured by one of moderators from a site I help to run, if you want to see the original go here:  http://www.transasianaxis.com/showthread.php?11538-Islamic-State-of-Iraq-and-al-Sham-ISIS&p=125333&viewfull=1#post125333

 

First Article:

Rick Perry: It’s possible ISIS has crossed southern border

Washington (CNN) – It’s a “very real possibility” that individuals with the extremist
group ISIS may have crossed into the United States at the southern border, Texas
Gov. Rick Perry said Thursday, though he added he doesn’t have any evidence.

Posted by
CNN’s Ashley Killough
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com…uthern-border/

Because the border is insecure, Perry said that “individuals from ISIS or other terrorist
states could be” taking advantage of the situation. “I think it’s a very real possibility
that they may have already used that,” he told an audience at the Heritage Foundation
in Washington.

“We have no clear evidence of that,” he continued.

Perry said Texas has seen historic levels of individuals from countries with terrorist ties
recently, including three Ukrainians arrested on a ranch in West Texas in the past two
months, he said.

Perry used the argument to frame the broken border situation as a matter of national
security.

“We need to have clear and compelling forces, both law and enforcement and
otherwise, to send the message that the border is secure,” the potential 2016
Republican presidential candidate said.

ISIS, a Sunni Muslim extremist group that refers to itself as the Islamic State, has
waged a rapid campaign across Iraq this summer seizing towns and villages and
targeting Christians, minority sects, and Shia Muslims.

In his remarks, Perry called for a more robust response to ISIS in Iraq, saying the
Obama administration’s recent actions have been inadequate.

“When they talk about limited airstrikes, they place a great emphasis on the word
‘limited,’ yet clearly more airstrikes are necessary,” he said. “Nothing less than a
sustained air campaign to degrade and destroy ISIS forces is required.”

Asked by a reporter in the audience if he would support combat troops on the ground,
Perry said, “all your options have to be open.”

Second Article:

Is this a prediction?

The article has now vanished!

http://foxweekly.com/1899/09/11/nati…on-the-us.html
AP: ISIS Militants Launches Attack On The U.S.

History repeats itself. Actions taken following ISIS attacks.

September 11, 1899 3 Comments

WASHINGTON
— If the Ferguson riots couldn’t have stressed Americans enough, a group of terrorist militants working for ISIS have launched a strike in U.S. locations. [sec. continue…] C. 1 – C.2 –

The Associated Press has confirmed reports of ISIS militants who crossed the U.S./Mexico border [sec. continue…]
The death toll is expected to rise [sec. continue…]

President Barack Obama is expected to have a retaliatory strategic plan on the table within the next 2 hours, as the president will be addressing the nation alongside General Charles Jacoby Jr.

The Deputy Chief Counsel of the FAA Pat A. McNall had announced earlier to ground all flights in and out of the U.S.

[sec continue…]


[sec continue…]

[sec continue…]

[sec continue…]

###

Source: AP

 

Rick Perry: ‘It’s a Promise’ Texas Will Stand Against BLM

Rick Perry: ‘It’s a Promise’ Texas Will Stand Against BLM

April 23, 2014

Texas Gov. Rick Perry says his state’s Attorney General Greg Abbott wasn’t making a dare against the federal government over a land rights dispute; it was a promise.

“He is on the right side of this issue, not just for the people of the State of Texas, he’s on the right side of this issue from the private property rights standpoint,” Perry said Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto.”

“I don’t think Americans want to see another one of these exhibitions from the federal government of them coming in with armed troops over an issue that ought to be taken care of with a little common sense,” Perry told guest host Stuart Varney.

“I am about ready to go to the Red River and raise a ‘Come and Take It’ flag to tell the feds to stay out of Texas,” Brietbart Texas reported Abbott as saying.

Abbott wrote a letter to Bureau of Land Management Director Neil Kornze about his concerns that the agency is trying to take 90,000 acres of land along the Red River from private citizens who have owned it for years.

“At a minimum they are overreaching, trying to grab land that belongs to Texans. Or worse, they are violating due process rights by just claiming that this land suddenly belongs to the federal government,” Abbott said Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “On the Record with Greta Van Susteren.”

The action stems from a dispute between Texas and Oklahoma over the two states’ common border. According to the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, the Red River is the border between them, but as the river’s course changes so does the border.

Numerous lawsuits between the states and the federal government have arisen over the years, and the BLM wants to solve the issue by federalizing the land, Texas officials say.

“We don’t have a clue why their trying to claim it, what basis they have to claim it on,” Abbott told Fox News.

But the BLM issued a statement saying it “is categorically not expanding federal holdings along the Red River,” Fox News reported.

Abbott said if that is true he’s happy, but he added that it contradicts other statemenst the BLM has made.

Ken Aderholt told Van Susteren that the agency is trying to take 500-600 acres of his 1,800-acre cattle ranch. He said the federal government owns the river and the sandy areas near its banks. But he said the local BLM office told him it wants part of his land that is far from the river’s banks.

Perry told Fox News he has no problem with Abbott’s words.

“Actually, it’s not a dare. It’s a promise that we’re going to stand up for private property rights in the State of Texas,” he said.

The federal government already owns too much land and needs to be talking about how they can divest themselves of huge landholdings “rather than coming in and taking over private property.”

The federal government owns large portions of many Western states. It owns more than 80 percent of the land in Nevada, where supporters of rancher Cliven Bundy recently forced a retreat by BLM agents attempting to seize Bundy’s cattle. He has refused to pay grazing fees for two decades.

Nevada Sen. Harry Reid has said the Bundy situation is not over, and called the rancher’s supporters “domestic terrorists.”

“I would suggest Sen. Reid spend a little more time in Nevada and get out of Washington, D.C., and to visit with those people that he is disparaging,” Perry told Fox News. Reid’s words, he added, are “not something you would want a leader in this country saying about the citizens of this country.”

Some of Bundy’s supporters had weapons, and Varney asked if Perry supports people taking up arms against the government.

“I have a problem with the federal government putting citizens in the position of having to feel like they have to use force to deal with their own government,” Perry responded.

“That’s the bigger issue.”

Abbott told Fox News that the border issue supposedly was settled in the mid-1990s. If the federal government tries to take private land from Texans, he said, the state will meet them in court.

US and Russian Ships playing Chicken

There have been “reports” (mostly rumors) that US and Russian ships are paying a kind of “Chicken” game today and yesterday.

Fox News allegedly announced (I did NOT hear this personally and am trying to get confirmation now) that the US is attempting to see what the Russians are doing with their “landing ships” but it appears the US is trying to see if the Russians are pulling Chemical Weapons off the coast being brought to them by the Syrians.

If that is the case, there’s a REASON now that the US wanted to WHACK those sites.  They gave too much warning, vacillated too much, and gave Putin an edge.

YOU CAN NOT TRUST THE RUSSIANS!

 

Benghazi: More cover up!

Well, it’s been almost a year.  Nothing has been done.  No one brought to justice.  No one has been arrested, not even in the White House.

Team involved in tracking Benghazi suspects pulling out, sources say

By Adam Housley

Published August 23, 2013

FoxNews.com

Two weeks after the Obama administration announced charges against suspects in the Benghazi attack, a large portion of the U.S. team that hunted the suspects and trained Libyans to help capture or kill them is leaving Libya permanently.

Special operators in the region tell Fox News that while Benghazi targets have been identified for months, officials in Washington could “never pull the trigger.” In fact, one source insists that much of the information on Benghazi suspects had been passed along to the White House after being vetted by the Department of Defense and the State Department — and at least one recommendation for direct action on a Benghazi suspect was given to President Obama as recently as Aug. 7.

Meanwhile, months after video, photo and voice documentation on the Benghazi suspects was first presented to high-level military leaders, the State Department and ultimately the White House, prison breaks in the country have eroded security. U.S. special forces have now been relegated to a “villa,” a stopover for the operators before they’re shipped out of the country entirely.

“We put American special operations in harm’s way to develop a picture of these suspects and to seek justice and instead of acting, we stalled. We just let it slip and pass us by and now it’s going to be much more difficult,” one source said, citing 1,200 prisoners escaping two weeks ago. “It’s already blowing up. Daily assassinations, bi-weekly prison escapes, we waited way too long.”

The latest development raises questions about when the attackers will be brought to justice in the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans last September.

The special operators are starting to get frustrated at the lack of action, and Fox News has been told by multiple sources that one special forces leader “literally yelled” at former Libyan Chief of Mission William Roebuck “and told him, ‘so you’re willing to let these guys get away with murder?'”

The outburst was “met with crickets,” the sources said.

Asked about what actions have been taken on the suspects, the U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment. However, a senior U.S. official with knowledge of the situation in Libya suggested there is always intelligence to be gained by simply watching and listening to the suspects.

In addition, Pentagon officials disputed what the operators in question are claiming, saying that group was not specifically tasked with finding the Libyan suspects responsible for the Benghazi attack. These officials said other forces out of Fort Bragg are tasked with that mission, and they are not leaving. Pentagon officials also say the trainers, which were authorized by Congress under part of the defense budget to facilitate training of Libyans for counterterrorism, were not there to track the Benghazi suspects. They insist congressional funding is very clear in its mission: for training locals in counterterrorism.

However, special operators in the region counter the claims and suggest the Pentagon and State Department are playing with words, saying those being pulled are in fact tasked with both training the Libyans and identifying Benghazi attack suspects. “The training is partly a cover and some of these guys … provided the information on suspects directly to U.S. military commanders and the U.S. State Department last November and again in January. They are there and trained to find, fix and finish,” one said.

Fox News reported earlier this year that American forces had identified suspects by the end of November 2012, and reported on their whereabouts to Roebuck last January, yet no action was taken. They returned again in January to identify and locate these same suspects after being requested to do so by military leaders. In the months since, the operators in the region have been sitting in de facto standby, despite the Justice Department charges being filed.

To make matters worse, the U.S. trainers have been sitting in their Libyan “villa” now for a number of days after a Libyan military leader kicked the Americans out of the camp where they had been standing-up a Libyan special forces team for nearly a year, backed by U.S. taxpayer dollars. The maneuver by the Libyan chief of defense has “left our guys high and dry,” and this same chief has locked down Tripoli as well, Fox News is told. The sources say U.S. leaders have now let the Libyan government occupy the special forces camp — and in turn undermine the effort to train a legitimate force capable of countering Al Qaeda, which was the initial assignment before the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi.

The men tell Fox News their mission was to capture or kill the suspects in question, and they briefed the acting U.S. ambassador in Libya and the senior CIA representative in the country. The men were told both Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and an under secretary were briefed about their information and their ability to capture or kill those responsible. Still, they did not get approval from the Department of Defense or the White House.

Some of the individuals report seeing former AFRICOM commander General Carter Ham tell former Libya Chief of Mission Laurence Pope that he could easily submit a plan to kill or capture the suspects, but “politics and fallout kept us from acting. To do an operation we have to have (Chief of Mission) and state approval. We didn’t get it. … They sat on it.”

Multiple sources in Libya tell Fox News that the politics in the lack of response to the Benghazi attacks involves the U.S. State Department position in Libya. “No career diplomat wants to be responsible for giving the green light or supporting an operation that if goes wrong, another Somalia, Blackhawk Down, turns into a political fragmentation grenade that puts any group, party, or element in the public scrutiny spotlight … especially after the train wreck on September 11th.”

Sources told Fox News, though, that the Obama administration will be under pressure to produce some result from its investigation with the one-year anniversary of the attack looming.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/23/team-involved-in-tracking-benghazi-suspects-pulling-out-sources-say/?bcsi-ac-f883d00464788be6=20EC69A20000000218Fqb6Th7mVksls86K/YfnIAzF4lEgAAAgAAAPUoRACEAwAACQAAAJs3BAA=#ixzz2cp2u3Dxd

%d bloggers like this: