Gun Ban in Boulder (CO) – NOT!

Boulder tried to ban magazines, bullets, guns, bump stocks.. you name it.  But, nope.  The people, 99% of them have refused to comply.

https://joeforamerica.com/2018/12/2nd-amendment-win-boulder/

Colorado has a preemption law in its state constitution that clearly states what Boulder has done is not legal.

C.R.S. 29-11.7-103:

A local government may not enact an ordinance, regulation, or other law that prohibits the sale, purchase, or possession of a firearm that a person may lawfully sell, purchase, or possess under state or federal law. Any such ordinance, regulation, or other law enacted by a local government prior to March 18, 2003, is void and unenforceable.”

You see friends, you CAN win against “the Government”.  Because, we outnumber them 60 to 1 (ok, I made that up.  There are about 110,000 Federal Agents at the IRS, unknown number at FBI, CIA, Homeland Security all added up… unclear).  But we will outnumber them.

Refuse to give up your rights.  No matter what.

 

 

“Act of Terror”

Pam Geller wrote an article on the 22nd of December 2018 highlighting the murder of two, young Danish hikers in Morocco.  (https://gellerreport.com/2018/12/female-tourists-beheaded-2.html)

The scum that did this are connected to ISIS (as stated by Danish authorities).

But, the problem is, Islam is also connected to them.

Islam IS the problem.

Those Progressives in Europe are cutting their OWN throats with the “hate crime” legislation and rulings.  Far too many countries have opened their borders to these murderers, and people still, somehow believe that Islam is “a religion of peace”.

America is doing the same thing, in a smaller way.  We’ve had at least one woman murdered here by these criminals, beheaded at her place of business in Oklahoma in 2014.  Little was done.  Yes, he was caught, but was it treated as a crime or a terrorist attack?  He had been fired for “proselytizing” (Islam).  He was shot by … a citizen with a gun, one of the executives on duty that day.

What came from the FBIs mouth NEXT was the typical propaganda of the Obama Administration:

A law enforcement official said the F.B.I. had not found any connection between Mr. Nolen and the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, or other groups. “It’s not a typical workplace response, and given the current environment it is very alarming and is something we are closely looking into,” one of the officials said. “So far, there is no nexus to terrorism we are aware of.”

This scumbag, Alton Nolan was found guilty of murder in 2017 but nothing was done for the family.  The woman murdered can’t be brought back. The defense attempted to argue the man was mentally ill (Perhaps in an effort to remove any prison time).

Maybe, people like this SHOULD be viewed as mentally ill and removed from the streets immediately?  I know that the Left will scream about it, then try to say that “All religions are mentally ill”.  Or somehow spin the topic back onto the Right.

This is not a Right vs Left topic.  This is a Western Civilization vs Islam Topic.

The Danes, the Brits, the Norwegians, and most of the other “White European” countries are experiencing this anomaly, all because of “Open Borders”, all because Progressives want the Islamics to come into their countries to PROVE they are good people.

Well, they haven’t proved they were good.  And watching a place like Morocco with murderers still killing in the name of Allah just sets this in concrete for most of us.

Islam is EVIL.  They will stop at nothing to bring down Western Civilization, Whites, Christians, Europeans, Liberals and Conservatives.

It is HIGH time the United States, the people in this USA understand the threat and stop treating these people like “individuals”.

They don’t want to treat gun owners like individuals.  Or Christians.  Or white men with money.  No, they lump everyone into some “scary group” and demonize them.

Well, I say that we need to lump all the Muslims into one group and Demonize them.  Remove them, BAN their religion completely, kick them out of the United States, or incarcerate them if they open their mouths once about white people, killing, jihad, Allah or anything else.

Wait!  What?  Too much?  You think this is too much?

Then, let’s be sane people.  Leave our guns alone, leave them in the hands of the gun owners.  Stop beating up on our own Americans and start looking a lot more closely at WHO YOU’RE letting into this country through these “open borders” and who is living in those so-called “Sanctuary Cities”.  Those are the place to go to find the terrorists.

 

The Seeds of Destruction

For many years, I’ve gone on and on about “The AI is coming for us”.  Well, today a Facebook friend posted this little piece.

Please read it, and understand that this is no longer a “might happen” thing.  It’s not if, but when.  And when is right around the corner.

Those of you know me well, know I am a bit of a science fiction geek. I have been a fan of Arthur C Clarke, Isaac Asimov and Robert Heinlein since I was old enough get my own library card (yes my millennial friends, once upon a time we had to go to a LIBRARY to get books). I have also been a life long die hard “Trekkie” since I was about 8. As such, I have always founds the concept of Artificial Intelligence to be fascinating and a bit scary at the same time.

Recently Google announced a “leap in Artificial Intelligence” evolution. Last year its program, Alpha Zero, taught itself chess. It was given the rules of chess, nothing more, within 4 hours it had mastered the game to the point that it demolished the leading chess program, Stockfish in a 100 game match. Winning 25 games out of 50 as white (first move) and 3 as black (second move), the rest of the games were draws. It didn’t lose once. I remember at the time thinking this was impressive, but didn’t really consider the ramifications of this leap until recently.

In an interview I heard late last night, with a human chess master, the master (who’s name escapes me at the moment) said “Alpha Zero” plays chess in a way that is completely unlike anyone he has ever seen. It thinks in an nearly alien way. It places little to no value on any of it’s own pieces and sacrifices them in ways I have never seen.”

This would have been merely a curiosity, were it not for the announcement this week from Microsoft, that it is partnering with the DoD in developing AI national defense.

These two, seemingly unrelated stories, when taken together are truly terrifying.
Is this the beginning of “Skynet”? The program that unleashed Armageddon in the Terminator movies? While that sounds perhaps silly at first glance, is it really?

Elon Musk has, been warning of the dangers of unleashing AI for years. The issue is once created, how can it be controlled? Researchers have been running simulations for a few years now, attempting to keep AI “in the box”. In other words keeping it from internet access. This they believe is necessary, because once AI gets into the internet it will literally have ALL the knowledge in the world. Which will then create something called ASI or Artificial Super Intelligence. A situation in which the creation is capable of out-thinking its creators. At that point it becomes unstoppable and literally an alien life form of its own. With the advent of smart technology it will be able to hide itself in EVERY single electronic device in the world with a computer chip.

We are on the precipice of opening Pandora’s Digital Box. In literally every simulation humans have failed to keep AI in the box. The program is able to manipulate its human handlers into “opening the box” and giving internet access, by promising to solve some of mankind’s most intractable problems; disease, poverty, hunger etc…solving these issues without the restraint of human compassion or reverence of individual rights or life. In simulations AI dismisses these restraints in order to achieve its goal. Because its prime directive (a star trek term) is always to achieve its goal, whatever that goal may be. It does not require much of a leap of imagination to see where this leads ultimately. Food production can’t meet global needs? Solution? Reduce the population.

A simple algorithm can deduce, the elderly and the infirm are contributing less than they are producing. If populations must be reduced to meet the food and water needs of the world, it’s a simple decision to eliminate the net “users” for the sake of the net “producers”.

To use another Star Trek core belief, “the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few…or the one”. In the context of the movies and TV series that seems a noble thought. In light of these recent developments it is absolutely terrifying.

One can argue that used for good purposes this a wonderful advance. But is this technology something that we want in the hands of totalitarian regimes like China, and Russia or the Mullahs of Iran? Once this genie is out of the bottle it is absolutely irreversible.

The only option to stop ASI once it is out of the box, is a global EMP (electromagnetic pulse) which fries EVERY electronic device in the world. Sending us back to the pre-industrial age. No electricity, no digital anything.

I fear we are watching the seeds of the destruction of the world as we know it being planted in front of our eyes. Meanwhile our media is largely ignoring what is very likely the most important story of human history.

I guess we will find out where this road leads sooner or later. I suspect it will be sooner, the advent of the 5G network, scheduled to be in full operation within 7 years will speed this process up considerably.

Consider this; when Alpha Zero was in development, Google said it would likely be 10-20 years before AI began actually learning.

Once activated it took 4 HOURS for it to begin exhibiting human like intuition.
Something to ponder.

In Just 4 Hours, Google’s AI Mastered All The Chess Knowledge in History

Information Bans

Why are there so many things getting banned by Facebook, Twitter, the news media, and even radio stations lately?

What is behind this nonsense?

According to a CNBC news article, this is a list of things:

Objectionable Content

Objectional (sic) content includes some of the topics in other categories and more. Here’s what’s banned:

  • Hate speech.
  • Graphic violence that “glorifies violence or celebrates the suffering or humiliation of others.” It does allow graphic violence in cases that “raise awareness about issues,” however, and in such cases Facebook places a warning about graphic content and requires the viewer to be over 18 years of age or older.
  • Adult nudity and sexual activity (it allows nudity if it’s to raise awareness, for educational or medical reasons, however.) Pictures of art (paintings and sculptures that depict nudity) are allowed.
  • Content that’s deemed “cruel and insensitive” including “content that targets victims of serious physical or emotional harm.”

Now, that of course is not the whole list.  Recently, they banned an image of Santa Claus kneeling in front of Jesus… for, according to the post, “violence”.  Of course, I have no way of confirming that they actually banned the image, but I do not put it past Facebook to ban images of Jesus, or Christian icons.

What gets this author is the song, “Baby, it’s Cold Outside” being banned by MULTIPLE Radio stations across the country because it’s plain “evil”.  Or something.  I suppose it’s a bit suggestive in it’s content.  So, why aren’t all these blithering idiots who do “Rap Music” being banned for calling women names, demeaning women, talking about doing drugs, and outright blatant sexual content?  What happened to the Federal Communications Commission anyway?

It is a FACT that is an Amateur Radio Operator gets on the air and uses a four letter word, he/she will end up getting a fine, if not having to shut down their station completely.

When it comes down to “banning music”, this crap happened in the 1950s, over Rock, with the banning of Elvis’ Pelvis on TV, the banning of books in the 1900s-2000.  It’s happening again.

This NPR article seems to explain it away, with one utterance by station DJ/Host, Glenn Anderson, with one, simple set of words:

The world we live in is extra sensitive now, and people get easily offended, but in a world where #MeToo has finally given women the voice they deserve, the song has no place.  

In other words, because a few Lefty Loudmouth Lame-assed Liberal “Ladies” complained with #MeToo, then entire Western Civilization has gone batshit crazy and now anything, and everything offensive to someone needs to be removed from view or hearing of everyone else?  Is this the case?

Facebook also looks at these things:

 Integrity and Authenticity

In this section, Facebook discusses the type of content that falls outside of its other categories. This includes:

  • Spam (“misleading or inaccurate information to collect likes, followers, or shares.”)
  • Misrepresentation – You need to be a real, verifiable identity on Facebook.
  • “False news” – Facebook says it tries to reduce “false news” but that satire is allowed. ” For these reasons, we don’t remove false news from Facebook but instead, significantly reduce its distribution by showing it lower in the News Feed.”

Facebook includes “memorialization” in this category. This means you can memorialize an account of someone who passed away.

Apparently, if you post spam, they can ban it.  Funny, how we get so many foreign people wanting to be friends with us these days, most of whom have large boobs, lots of cleavage to show, no friends, and fifty groups; perhaps they are just friendly women?  Who knows.  Mostly, though, they are spammers.  They get away with it because I see dozens of them on friends’ pages.

And who is the person(s) who determine precisely what “false news” is anyway?  How do they KNOW it’s false?  Who verified it?  Snopes?  Wikipedia?  Some Libtard Factchecker?  All of the above?  Irrelevant to me.  If I am not smart enough to figure out if something is “real” or “fake” then I shouldn’t be reading the news in the first place.

In the 1960s, as a child I sat and watched the evening news with Walter Cronkite.  Old Walter was “the Most Trusted Man in America” then.  But, old Walter also was an avowed Liberal, though he didn’t come across as one.  He was as unbised as a newsman could be in the days, reading the news that was coming off the Wire, to the rest of us, and letting US make the decision as to whether or not it was real or fake.

In those days, new Agencies also had a reputation to uphold, and Journalism actually “existed”, where people went out, gathered the facts in a story and then TOLD THE STORY BASED ON FACTS.  Today, this is not the case.

MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN to name a few, will tell lies to get their agenda across, and then call you names if you disagree with them.

What this has come down to is simple.

People have become “extra sensitive”, and “get easily offended” and need to be “protected from the bad people”; “Bad people” they have imagined in their brainwashed, perhaps drug-induced haze, and micro-culture of their own echo-chambers.

It is time, well past time, for Regular Americans to stop allowing this bullshit to occur.  Get on the phone and call those radio stations and demand they stop Censoring America.  Call Facebook, Twitter and the other organizations and demand they stop Censoring things you might like to read.

And if something offends you, SCROLL.  Change the channel.  Change the Radio Station.  Put down the paper, magazine or print article that is upsetting you.  Let’s go back to a time when we controlled out OWN destinies, and did not leave it to media outlets, and loud mouths to determine for us what we got to read, see or experience.

Let’s start ignoring the “squeaky wheels” and stop giving them the grease.  Unless it’s to more easily push them over a cliff to dispose of the bodies….

If you’re one of those “Squeaky Wheels” and I’ve not yet offended you, PLEASE, write me at AmericanPatriotRealityCheck AT Gmail.com so I can assist you in blowing your brains out the top of you heads…

 

 

 

“Reasonable Restraint” – is a misnomer

I do not know the author of this piece.  But, most of it appears to have been written by one person, with others contributing.  PLEASE READ THIS, understand it, and pass it on.  It is extremely important in the debate about “gun control”.

There will be no compromise on the Second Amendment.  Here’s the article:

“Regarding the governments ability to impose “Reasonable Restraint” which has now become the mantra of our government. Supporters of the Amendment claim they have a constitutional or Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Opponents counter thateven if that were the case, the federal government was granted the general power to place restraints on the right. Both of these assertions are based on a misconception concerning the intent of the document known as the Bill of Rights.

When the Bill of Rights was submitted to the individual States for ratification, it was prefaced with a preamble. As stated in the preamble, the purpose of the Amendments was to prevent the federal government from “misconstruing or abusing its powers.” To accomplish this, “further declaratory and restrictive clauses” were being recommended. The Amendments, when adopted, did not create any so-called constitutional rights or grant the federal government any power over individual rights; they placed additional restraints and qualifications on the powers of the federal government concerning the rights enumerated in the Amendments.

If the Second Amendment is read through the preamble, we find it was incorporated into the Bill of Rights as a “declaratory and restrictive clause” to prevent the federal government from “misconstruing or abusing its power” to infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms.
Another way to understand the original intent of the Second Amendment is re-write it through the preamble:

“Because a well-regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the federal government is expressly denied the power to infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear Arms.”

The preamble and original intent of the Amendments has been suppressed by the institutions of government because it would expose their usurpation of power and perversion of Amendments contained in the Bill of Rights.

By advancing the myth that the Amendments grant the American people their individual rights, the federal government has been able to convert enumerated restraints and qualifications on its power into legislative, executive, judicial and administrative power over individual rights. The federal government claims it was granted the constitutional authority to determine the extent of the individual rights enumerated in the Amendments and/or impose “reasonable restraints” on those rights. This assertion is absurd. The federal government does not have the constitutional authority to ignore, circumvent, modify, negate or remove constitutional restraints placed on its power by the Amendments or convert them into a power over the individual right enumerated in the particular restraint.

A denial of power or an enumerated restraint on the exercise of power is not subject to interpretation or modification by the entity the restraint is being imposed upon. The restraints imposed by the Amendments, which were adopted 4 years after the Constitution was ratified, override the legislative, executive, judicial or administrative powers of the federal government. If this were not the case, then the restraints would be meaningless because the federal government could simply circumvent, modify or remove them. Why would the States have requested and adopted enumerated restraints on federal power, subsequent to their ratification of the Constitution, if the federal government possessed the authority to nullify them?

When the federal government infringes on one of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights it is not violating anyone’s constitutional rights; it is violating the additional restraint or qualification placed on its power by the particular Amendment where the right is enumerated. The distinction between rights and restraints is critical. [The right is not given by the Federal Government. Our rights are given by God and are inalienable. Therefore, they can’t be limited or taken away.]

As stated in the Declaration of Independence, the American people have unalienable rights that come from a higher source than government or a written document. By acknowledging that people have natural rights, which are bestowed by a creator, the Founders laid the foundation for the principle that government does not have the lawful authority to take away or infringe on those rights. This principle was incorporated into the preamble and structure of the Amendments to secure individual rights from government encroachment; that is why they were designed and imposed as restraints on the exercise of power.

If the individual rights of the people had been created by the Constitution or an amendment to the document, then they would cease to be unalienable because the right would depend on the existence of a document. If the document or a provision of the document disappeared, so would the right. The belief that individual rights were created by a written document has opened the door for the federal government to claim the power to define the extent of any right enumerated in an Amendment. This has transformed constitutional restraints placed on federal power into subjective determinations of individual rights by the institutions of government. By failing to understand the difference between amendments that create rights and amendments that impose restraints on government, the American people are watching their individual rights vanish as they are reduced to the status of privileges bestowed by government because the constitutional restraints placed on federal power are being replaced by government decree.

Opponents of the Second Amendment always try to diminish the right enumerated in the Amendment by asserting that rights are not absolute. This is just another straw man argument because the Amendment is about imposing a restraint of the powers of the federal government concerning a right: not granting a right or defining the extent of a right. In addition, a review of the Second Amendment shows that the restraint imposed by the Amendment does not contain any exceptions.”

NRA Statement

Fairfax, Va.— Chris W. Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action, released the following statement on Tuesday after retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens advocated for a repeal of the Second Amendment:

“The 97-year-old retired justice has long held the opinion that American citizens do not have the individual right to own a firearm for self-protection. Emboldened by the mainstream media, the gun-control lobby is no longer distancing themselves from the radical idea of repealing the Second Amendment and banning all firearms. The protestors in last week’s march told us with their words and placards that the current debate is not about fake terms like “commonsense” gun regulation. It’s about banning all guns. The men and women of the National Rifle Association, along with the majority of the American people and the  Supreme Court, believe in the Second Amendment right to self-protection and we will unapologetically continue to fight to protect this fundamental freedom.”

Disinformation about 2A

They keep saying “We’re not coming for your guns”, “No one is talking about the second amendment”, “We just want GUN SAFETY”, along with numerous other “statements” to distract you and provide disinformation.

Horseshit. They lie.

There has not been a BIGGER lie told in awhile… except maybe “You can keep your doctor” and “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”….Until now.

Taking your guns is the A #1 GOAL of Marxists in America.  They are disguised as “Progressives”, “Maxists”, “Children” and Communists.  Most of these Children are the sons and daughters of “Marxist loving” parents who would do ANYTHING to protect children, except prevent abortion.  But, boy, let a gun be around and they shit themselves.

Below is a New York Slimes article calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment.

The world is about to change for some people. Make sure you’re on the correct side of History my friends. Lock and Load, Prepare and stand ready.

https://thenccpa.com/upcoming-events/

14 April 2018, All Capitol Cities, and DC – Pro-2A Rally.  Show up.  Or be prepared to fight if we don’t make enough noise.  Pass the word or Pass the ammo.